Antitrust Remedies in the U.S. and EU: Advancing a Standard of Proportionality
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 377-425
ISSN: 1930-7969
19 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 377-425
ISSN: 1930-7969
In: The British journal of social work, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 745-761
ISSN: 1468-263X
In: The Political Economy of International Trade Law, S. xiii-xiv
In: The Political Economy of International Trade Law, S. 248-253
In: Alcohol and alcoholism: the international journal of the Medical Council on Alcoholism (MCA) and the journal of the European Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ESBRA), Band 44, Heft 2, S. 155-165
ISSN: 1464-3502
Topics such as military tribunals, same-sex marriage, informative privacy, reproductive rights, affirmative action, and states' rights fill the landscape of contemporary legal debate and media discussion, and they all fall under the umbrella of the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. However, what is not always fully understood is the constitutional basis of these rights, or the exact list of due process rights as they have evolved over time through judicial interpretation. In The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law, Sullivan and Massaro describe the intricate.
From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to contemporary theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power. Two renowned legal scholars seek to advance such a theory
In Proportionality Principles in American Law, E. Thomas Sullivan and Richard S. Frase advance a general theory of proportionality for the American legal system. They argue that standards of review should be more clearly and precisely defined, and that in most circumstances every intrusive government measure which limits or threatens individual rights should undergo some degree of proportionality review. The authors identify three basic ways that government measures and private remedies have been found to be disproportionate and use this framework to examine contemporary and potential uses of proportionality principles in public law, civil liberties, and the criminal justice system, emphasizing their utility to guide judicial review of excessive government measures.
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Band 52, Heft 3-4, S. 435-474
ISSN: 1930-7969
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 55-118
ISSN: 1930-7969
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 373-399
ISSN: 1930-7969
In: Antitrust Bulletin, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 55
SSRN
In: Community development journal, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 511-525
ISSN: 1468-2656
In: Alcohol and alcoholism: the international journal of the Medical Council on Alcoholism (MCA) and the journal of the European Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ESBRA), Band 46, Heft Supplement 1, S. i14-i14
ISSN: 1464-3502